Explain and evaluate the Analogical Design Argument for God's Essay

Explain and evaluate the Analogical Design Argument for Gods existence - Essay ExampleThe adapting of such ways is in resemblance to the creation of gentle setup, its intelligence and wisdom. Due to the similarities, it is logical to say that God, who is natures author, is in some capacity similar to mans mind though He has a higher capacity (Schick and Vaughn).Just like parts of a machine, the universe parts fit together perfectly to carry out variant functions. The structure of an element is an example of how the analogy whole kit the atom is formed from sub-atomic particles. The atoms form molecules which then from an element. Just like machines that have sources, probably an engineer, the universe has its designer who is God.Paleys analogy revolves around a gemstone and a bear. He argues that in the situation of being asked to explain the presence of a stone, he would easy state that it had lain there forever. However, had it been a watch on the ground, it would raise more questions as how it had gotten there. The first answer will be that it has been dropped there unlike the stone which was assumed to be always lying there. The difference in assumption is attributed to the fact that the watch has parts that have been framed assembled for a specific aim (Schick and Vaughn).The mechanism is that the watch had a maker that exists or had existed and had made it for a specific purpose and understands its construction and design. Paleys argues that the universe resembles the watch and that every watch has a designer hence, the universe most likely has a designer who is God.The universe was intended for a purpose and the designer had a goal that he intended to accomplish. When the designer needs a universe to attain that goal, the designer fails to be all powerful (Schick and Vaughn).The analogical design says that human artifacts are the works of an intelligent design. Moreover, the universe is similar to the human artifacts hence, the universe is also a design of an intelligent being. Proponents of the