Aesthetics And Beauty In Society Essay

Introduction Contemporary society has one of its implicit norms concepts on aesthetics and beauty. When beauty is communicate of, some of us pee-pee the immediate conceptions of somatic fitness, viandsing, and sit downisfaction with our appearances. Media has been successful at ingraining the ideals in each one of these criteria. We are thus acculturated to thought process that beautiful is tall, thin, and is a health buff in terms of diet. Are perceptions or evaluations of each of these variables gendered?To find out the answer to this question, an empirical study was conducted among Philadelphia residents to visualize if they had substantial differences in their evaluations of the following variables 1) satisfaction with their present lading 2) perceptions on their consumption of a legal diet and 3) perceptions of their level of somatic fitness.The selection of respondents has been through through convenience sampling, where the questionnaires were deployed to immediate f amily, acquaintances, and colleagues at work. The portion of the questionnaire which shall be discussed in the current paper is the one which focused on the three variables outlined above. Thus, the self-employed person variable is gender while the dependent variables are 1) satisfaction with their present system of weights 2) perceptions on their consumption of a healthy diet and 3) perceptions of their level of physical fitness.HypothesesThe following are the null and alternative hypotheses for testing significant differences between males and females for each of these variablesSatisfaction with Present Weight cipher Hypothesis There is no significant difference between males and females on their evaluations of satisfaction with their present weight.H0mmales physical fitness = mfemales physical fitnessAlternative Hypothesis There is a significant difference between males and females on their evaluations of satisfaction with their present weight.Ha mmales physical fitness mfemal es physical fitnessConsumption of a Healthy DietNull Hypothesis There is no significant difference between males and females on their evaluations of their consumption of a healthy diet.Ho mmales sat with weight = mfemales sat with weightAlternative Hypothesis There is a significant difference between males and females on their evaluations of their consumption of a healthy diet.Ho mmales sat with weight mfemales sat with weightLevel of Physical FitnessNull Hypothesis There is no significant difference between males and females on their evaluations of their level of physical fitness.H0mmales cons of healthy diet = mfemales cons of healthy dietAlternative Hypothesis There is a significant difference between males and females on their evaluations of their level of physical fitness.H0mmales cons of healthy diet mfemales cons of healthy dietTable 1 at a lower place is a synthesis of these hypothesesTable 1. Summary of alternative and null hypotheses. Dependent covariantIndependent Var iableNull Hypothesis(H0)Alternative Hypothesis (Ha)Level of Physical FitnessGenderH0mmales physical fitness = mfemales physical fitnessHa mmales physical fitness mfemales physical fitnessSatisfaction with Present WeightGenderHo mmales sat with weight = mfemales sat with weightHo mmales sat with weight mfemales sat with weightLevel of Consumption of a Healthy DietGenderH0mmales cons of healthy diet = mfemales cons of healthy dietH0mmales cons of healthy diet mfemales cons of healthy diet methodologyConvenience sampling has been used in the selection of the respondents for the survey. The lone criterion that has been utilized in their inclusion is the fact that they are Philadelphia residents. The respondents consisted of our immediate families, friends, colleagues and other acquaintances. The original number of respondents who participated in the study was 341. Of this number, 36% are males, while the remainder is females. The gender breakdown of the sample is depicted in approx imate 1 belowFigure 1. Gender breakdown of respondents.Because non-probability sampling was used in the selection of respondents, this may have introduced sources of error into the outcomes of the study. First, the sample may not be case of males and females in Philadelphia overall. The results may only be generalized and valid for the profile of the respondents who participated in the study.To determine the independent variable, there was a question that asked for the respondents gender. On the other hand, the three dependent variables have been measured through a 10-point Likert scale, with 1 indicating strong disagreement, to 10 suggesting strong agreement.Method of Data summaryTo yield the statistical computations and analysis, Microsoft Excel has been used. The statistical tool that was appropriate for the current study is the t-test for two independent samples. When using the tool itself, it appears as t-test assuming em torso variances in the data analysis feature of MS Ex cel. The software automatically provides the t-computed and the t-critical from which one may determine if the outcomes are significant or not. All tests have been conducted using the .05 level of significance or the alpha level.This represents the probability of saying that the null speculation is true even upon rejection, or simply the likelihood of make a wrong conclusion. In cases where the probability value computed is less than the significance level, the results of the comparison are said to be significant and the null hypothesis is rejected. another(prenominal) way of determining significance is to examine the t-computed and the t-critical, when the latter is less than the t-computed, then the outcomes of the comparison are also interpreted as significance. In effect, the null hypothesis is rejected.ResultsLevel of Satisfaction with Present WeightBecause of various factors including the media and culture itself, there seems to be more pressure among females to maintain onl y a certain body weight, which is deemed socially acceptable. If they do not, they seem to run the risk of being discriminated or to be undesirable in the eyes of males. It is thus expected that females go out have a significantly lower baseborn compared to their male counterparts.Table 2 below shows the descriptive statistics of males with regards to their satisfaction of their present body weight.Table 2.descriptive Statistics for Males Satisfaction with Present Weight. Mean6.72 bill Error0.26Median7.50Mode10.00Standard Deviation2.92Sample air division8.55Kurtosis-0.85Skewness-0.59Range9.00Minimum1.00 uttermost10.00Sum833.00Count124.00Confidence Level(95.0%)0.52Figure 2.The figures above suggest that males have a mean of 6.72, measuring their average satisfaction on their present weight. The median is higher at 7.50. The most frequently occurring score is 10. There are 124 male respondents who garnered valid responses for this item.Table 3.Descriptive Statistics for Females Sat isfaction with Present Height. Mean5.23Standard Error0.21Median5.00Mode1.00Standard Deviation3.06Sample Variance9.36Kurtosis-1.31Skewness0.09Range9.00Minimum1.00Maximum10.00Sum1134.00Count217.00Confidence Level(95.0%)0.41Figure 3.Table 3 above depicts the descriptive statistics for female respondents on the same item of satisfaction with their current weight. The mean is 5.23 which is lower than those of males. The median is lower than the mean at 5.00. Finally, the most frequently occurring score is 1.00. There are a total of 217 females who responded to the item.Table 3. T-test for satisfaction with present weight.MaleFemaleMean6.71774195.225806Variance8.54569899.360812Observations124217Pooled Variance9.0650633Hypothesized Mean Difference0df339t Stat4.4017781P(T